Review article

The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved?

Brown JM, Carlson DJ, Brenner DJ

View Source Source Verified

DoseLab summary

Review of the radiobiology behind SRS and SBRT. It lists the five Rs — repair, repopulation, redistribution, reoxygenation and intrinsic radiosensitivity — notes that the first four were described by Withers and the fifth added by Steel, and explains that redistribution and reoxygenation increase cell kill over a fractionated course while repair and repopulation increase cell survival. It argues that hypoxia is likely to matter more for SRS/SBRT than for conventional fractionation, and concludes that for most tumors the classic 5 Rs and the linear-quadratic model are sufficient, with the excellent clinical results explained by the much larger BEDs delivered (with the likely exception of enhanced antitumor immunity for some tumors). Read in PubMed Central (author manuscript, PMC3893711).

Why this is useful

A clear explanation of the 5 Rs and how they pull in opposite directions — then a look at whether SRS and SBRT need anything more to explain their results.

Reference details

Title
The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved?
Authors / organization
Brown JM, Carlson DJ, Brenner DJ
Publication / protocol
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(2):254–262
Version
Pending verification
Year
2014
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.022
Disease sites
Lung, CNS / Brain
Topics
Radiobiology, SBRT, SRS, 4 Rs, Hypoxia, Linear-quadratic model
Fractionation context
SRS and SBRT (one or a few large fractions) compared with conventional fractionation
Last reviewed by DoseLab
2026-10-07

Cited on DoseLab