The NRG Oncology template for the radiation section of a conventionally fractionated lung trial. Its imaging section allows PET/CT or MRI for structure definition but asks that the final contours be confirmed on the planning CT, follows AAPM TG-132 for deformable registration, and notes that PET can help separate tumor from atelectasis. For plan evaluation it defines the prescription as the dose covering 95% of the PTV, with a protocol-specific D99% requirement, and asks that any dose above 105% of the prescription fall within the PTV rather than in normal tissue outside it.
Hotspots
Regions receiving more than the prescription dose. Where a hotspot sits matters as much as how hot it is.
What is it?
A hotspot is a region of the plan receiving more than the prescription dose. Almost every plan has one somewhere — the question is how hot it is, how big it is, and where it sits.
How hot is usually reported as a near-maximum dose rather than a single-point maximum, because a single voxel depends on the calculation grid size and placement. NRG protocol templates define the maximum dose as the dose to the hottest 0.03 cc (D0.03cc); the ICRU Report 83 homogeneity index uses D2%, the dose to the hottest 2% of the target, to stand for its maximum.
Why does it matter?
The same hotspot can be acceptable in one place and a problem in another:
- Inside the target. In conventionally fractionated plans, a hotspot inside the PTV is expected but held to a limit — NRG's standard-fractionation lung template, for example, asks that the maximum dose stay below 115% of prescription. In stereotactic plans it can be intended: the NRG lung SBRT template describes a heterogeneous dose with the hotspot in the central region of the GTV.
- Outside the target. Dose above prescription in normal tissue is generally unwanted. NRG's standard-fractionation lung template asks that any dose above 105% of prescription fall within the PTV, not in normal tissue outside it; the lung SBRT template likewise asks planners to avoid dose above 105% of prescription outside the PTV.
- In or next to an organ at risk. Where the PTV overlaps an organ at risk, the NRG lung SBRT template recommends minimizing hotspots in the overlap.
A plan can therefore meet a maximum-dose limit and still have its hotspot in the wrong place, which is why location is checked visually as well as numerically.
How is it evaluated?
- Read the near-maximum dose of the PTV — and of each organ at risk — from the dose-volume histogram, using the metric your protocol names.
- Display an isodose line above the prescription — the level named in your protocol — and scroll through every slice to see where it sits.
- To find high dose outside the target, create a structure of the body minus the PTV and read its maximum dose.
- Check overlap regions between the PTV and organs at risk separately.
The allowed size and location of hotspots are protocol-specific. DoseLab does not reproduce those limits beyond the examples quoted above; use the original protocol.
Example
Authoritative resources
The template NRG Oncology gives investigators for writing the radiation section of a lung SBRT trial. Its imaging section allows PET/CT or MRI for structure definition, asks that the images be registered accurately to the planning scan (following AAPM TG-132 for deformable registration), notes that PET may be needed to separate tumor from atelectasis or fibrosis, and suggests an extra margin when a fused image is the primary image for the GTV. Its target and planning sections (5.2.4 and 5.2.6–5.2.8) define the plan-quality measures for lung SBRT trials: the prescription as the dose covering 95% of the PTV, a D99% requirement, R100% (prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV), R50% (50% prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV) and D2cm (maximum dose at 2 cm from the PTV in any direction, as a percentage of the prescription), with a table of allowable dose spillage by PTV volume. It describes a 20 mm PTV expansion structure used to control intermediate dose spillage, asks that dose above 105% of prescription be avoided outside the PTV, describes a deliberately heterogeneous dose with the hotspot in the central GTV, defines the maximum dose on a 0.03 cc volume, and ranks planning priorities when target coverage and organ limits conflict.
The NRG Oncology template for the radiation section of a brain radiosurgery trial. Its example text asks for CT slices of 1.25 mm or less, strongly encourages MRI (contrast T1 and a 3D gradient-echo sequence) for target delineation, recommends fusing FDG-PET/CT when available, and asks that the fusion be done by a medical physicist and reviewed by the attending physician. Its plan-evaluation section defines the conformity index (CI, or R100%) as the prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV volume, R50% as the 50% prescription isodose volume ÷ target volume ("R50% defines dose falloff outside the target"), a heterogeneity index D5% ÷ D95%, and coverage as the PTV volume receiving the prescription dose ÷ PTV volume, and notes that criteria such as the CI should account for target size and treatment technology.
ICRU report on prescribing, recording and reporting intensity-modulated photon therapy. DoseLab has not read the report itself (it is sold by the ICRU). Its homogeneity index, (D2% − D98%) / D50%, is checked as quoted in the open-access Yan 2019 paper.
Retrospective study of 99 plans comparing five homogeneity index formulas. Its introduction summarizes the RTOG index (maximum isodose in the target ÷ reference isodose), D5%/D95%, and (D2% − D98%) ÷ prescribed dose, and explains that D2% and D98% are used because true point maximum and minimum doses are sensitive to calculation grid size and placement. Full text read in Europe PMC (PMC3532749).
TPS guidance
Step-by-step guidance planned. Added only once verified.
Step-by-step guidance planned. Added only once verified.