Plan quality

Hotspots

Regions receiving more than the prescription dose. Where a hotspot sits matters as much as how hot it is.

What is it?

A hotspot is a region of the plan receiving more than the prescription dose. Almost every plan has one somewhere — the question is how hot it is, how big it is, and where it sits.

How hot is usually reported as a near-maximum dose rather than a single-point maximum, because a single voxel depends on the calculation grid size and placement. NRG protocol templates define the maximum dose as the dose to the hottest 0.03 cc (D0.03cc); the ICRU Report 83 homogeneity index uses D2%, the dose to the hottest 2% of the target, to stand for its maximum.

Why does it matter?

The same hotspot can be acceptable in one place and a problem in another:

  • Inside the target. In conventionally fractionated plans, a hotspot inside the PTV is expected but held to a limit — NRG's standard-fractionation lung template, for example, asks that the maximum dose stay below 115% of prescription. In stereotactic plans it can be intended: the NRG lung SBRT template describes a heterogeneous dose with the hotspot in the central region of the GTV.
  • Outside the target. Dose above prescription in normal tissue is generally unwanted. NRG's standard-fractionation lung template asks that any dose above 105% of prescription fall within the PTV, not in normal tissue outside it; the lung SBRT template likewise asks planners to avoid dose above 105% of prescription outside the PTV.
  • In or next to an organ at risk. Where the PTV overlaps an organ at risk, the NRG lung SBRT template recommends minimizing hotspots in the overlap.

A plan can therefore meet a maximum-dose limit and still have its hotspot in the wrong place, which is why location is checked visually as well as numerically.

How is it evaluated?

  1. Read the near-maximum dose of the PTV — and of each organ at risk — from the dose-volume histogram, using the metric your protocol names.
  2. Display an isodose line above the prescription — the level named in your protocol — and scroll through every slice to see where it sits.
  3. To find high dose outside the target, create a structure of the body minus the PTV and read its maximum dose.
  4. Check overlap regions between the PTV and organs at risk separately.

The allowed size and location of hotspots are protocol-specific. DoseLab does not reproduce those limits beyond the examples quoted above; use the original protocol.

Example

OARPTVGTVhotspot in central GTVhotspot outsidethe PTV, in an OAR
Schematic only. A central GTV hotspot can be intended in SBRT; dose above prescription outside the PTV or in an organ at risk generally is not.

Authoritative resources

Clinical resourceSource Verified
NRG Oncology Protocol Development Template for Radiation Therapy — Lung: Standard Fractionation
Matuszak M, Ritter T, Li Z, et al. · NRG Oncology Medical Physics Subcommittee / Radiation Oncology Committee · 2024

The NRG Oncology template for the radiation section of a conventionally fractionated lung trial. Its imaging section allows PET/CT or MRI for structure definition but asks that the final contours be confirmed on the planning CT, follows AAPM TG-132 for deformable registration, and notes that PET can help separate tumor from atelectasis. For plan evaluation it defines the prescription as the dose covering 95% of the PTV, with a protocol-specific D99% requirement, and asks that any dose above 105% of the prescription fall within the PTV rather than in normal tissue outside it.

Clinical resourceSource Verified
NRG Oncology Protocol Development Template for Radiation Therapy — Lung: SBRT
Matuszak M, Chetty I, Robinson C, Weldon M, Timmerman R · NRG Oncology Medical Physics Subcommittee / Radiation Oncology Committee · 2016

The template NRG Oncology gives investigators for writing the radiation section of a lung SBRT trial. Its imaging section allows PET/CT or MRI for structure definition, asks that the images be registered accurately to the planning scan (following AAPM TG-132 for deformable registration), notes that PET may be needed to separate tumor from atelectasis or fibrosis, and suggests an extra margin when a fused image is the primary image for the GTV. Its target and planning sections (5.2.4 and 5.2.6–5.2.8) define the plan-quality measures for lung SBRT trials: the prescription as the dose covering 95% of the PTV, a D99% requirement, R100% (prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV), R50% (50% prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV) and D2cm (maximum dose at 2 cm from the PTV in any direction, as a percentage of the prescription), with a table of allowable dose spillage by PTV volume. It describes a 20 mm PTV expansion structure used to control intermediate dose spillage, asks that dose above 105% of prescription be avoided outside the PTV, describes a deliberately heterogeneous dose with the hotspot in the central GTV, defines the maximum dose on a 0.03 cc volume, and ranks planning priorities when target coverage and organ limits conflict.

Clinical resourceSource Verified
NRG Oncology Protocol Development Template for Radiation Therapy — Brain: SRS
Cui Y, Ogunleye T, Kirkpatrick J, Xiao Y, Sperduto P, et al. · NRG Oncology Medical Physics Subcommittee / Radiation Oncology Committee · 2016

The NRG Oncology template for the radiation section of a brain radiosurgery trial. Its example text asks for CT slices of 1.25 mm or less, strongly encourages MRI (contrast T1 and a 3D gradient-echo sequence) for target delineation, recommends fusing FDG-PET/CT when available, and asks that the fusion be done by a medical physicist and reviewed by the attending physician. Its plan-evaluation section defines the conformity index (CI, or R100%) as the prescription isodose volume ÷ PTV volume, R50% as the 50% prescription isodose volume ÷ target volume ("R50% defines dose falloff outside the target"), a heterogeneity index D5% ÷ D95%, and coverage as the PTV volume receiving the prescription dose ÷ PTV volume, and notes that criteria such as the CI should account for target size and treatment technology.

Professional guidelineUnder Review
ICRU Report 83: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
DeLuca P, Jones D, Gahbauer R, et al. · International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) · 2010

ICRU report on prescribing, recording and reporting intensity-modulated photon therapy. DoseLab has not read the report itself (it is sold by the ICRU). Its homogeneity index, (D2% − D98%) / D50%, is checked as quoted in the open-access Yan 2019 paper.

Planning studySource Verified
Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments
Kataria T, Sharma K, Subramani V, Karrthick KP, Bisht SS · 2012

Retrospective study of 99 plans comparing five homogeneity index formulas. Its introduction summarizes the RTOG index (maximum isodose in the target ÷ reference isodose), D5%/D95%, and (D2% − D98%) ÷ prescribed dose, and explains that D2% and D98% are used because true point maximum and minimum doses are sensitive to calculation grid size and placement. Full text read in Europe PMC (PMC3532749).

TPS guidance

Eclipse

Step-by-step guidance planned. Added only once verified.

Coming soon
RayStation

Step-by-step guidance planned. Added only once verified.

Coming soon